Leadership and Quality Improvement Project: Research Article Summary .Group Presentation Topic must be assigned before completing this paper. Each student within the group will find one unique, peer-reviewed research article related to the
Leadership and Quality Improvement Project: Research Article Summary ***Group Presentation Topic must be assigned before
completing this paper. Each student within the group will find one unique,
peer-reviewed research article related to the group topic that will be used
to contribute to the presentation. The article must be less than 5 years old
and from a scholarly, peer- reviewed source. If you submit the same article
as one of your peers in the group, you may be required to resubmit the
assignment. Each group member will turn in their assigned article with a 250-
350-word, doublespaced summary of the article. Summary must contain: a. Correctly formatted APA
reference for the article. b. One paragraph summary
that discusses the research problem, process, and results. c.
One paragraph discussing how this article relates to
the topic and how it will help complete the presentation. d.
Refer to rubric for all requirements including
formatting. Research Article Summary Rubric |
||||||
|
Criteria |
Exceeds |
Satisfactory |
Needs |
Unacceptable |
|
|
|
Expectations |
|
Improvement |
|
|
|
Correctly formatted |
The citation is in APA |
The citation has 1-2 |
The citation has 3 or |
Citation is missing or |
|
|
APA reference |
format with no |
errors in formatting |
more errors |
not in APA. |
|
|
|
errors |
7.5 pts |
5 pts |
0 pts |
|
|
|
10 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of |
• Content is in- |
• Content is |
• Content is lacking |
Content is lacking |
|
|
• Research |
depth and well- |
acceptable and |
or minimally |
and not organized |
|
|
problem |
organized |
adequately |
organized |
0 pts |
|
|
• Description of |
• All 3 criteria are |
organized |
• Not all criteria |
|
|
|
research process |
present and |
• All 3 criteria are |
meet minimum |
|
|
|
• Results of study |
substantive |
present |
standards |
|
|
|
(CSLO 2) |
40 pts |
30 pts |
15 pts |
|
|
|
Discussion of |
• Discussion |
• Discussion |
• Discussion |
• Article has no |
|
|
• How does the |
demonstrates in- |
demonstrates an |
demonstrates |
relevance to topic |
|
|
article relate to |
depth rationale of |
acceptable |
minimal |
• Summaiy does |
|
|
the group topic? |
article’s relevance |
rationale |
expectations of |
not meet minimal |
|
|
• How will the |
to topic and how |
displaying article |
article’s relevance |
expectations |
|
|
article help me |
it will contribute |
has some |
to topic or how it |
• Lack of detail on |
|
|
complete the |
to the |
relevance to topic |
will contribute to |
article’s relevance |
|
|
presentation? |
presentation |
and how it will |
the presentation |
to group topic or |
|
|
(CSLO 2) |
• Both criteria are |
contribute to the |
• Not all criteria |
how the article |
|
|
|
discussed with a |
presentation |
meet minimum |
will be used to |
|
|
|
high level of |
• Both criteria are |
standards |
complete the |
|
|
|
critical thinking |
discussed |
15 pts |
presentation. |
|
|
|
40 pts |
30 pts |
|
0 pts |
|
|
APA, Grammar, and |
The summary and |
The summary meets |
The summary meets |
The summary does |
|
|
Mechanics |
analysis meet and |
and adequately |
and adequately |
not adequately |
|
|
• Article is less |
adequately |
address all the |
address all the |
address the criteria |
|
|
than 5 years old |
addresses all the |
criteria with 1-2 |
criteria with 3-4 |
or has 5 or more |
|
|
(unless it is a |
criteria with no |
exceptions or errors. |
exceptions or errors. |
errors. Length |
|
|
seminal work) |
exceptions or errors. |
|
|
requirement is not |
|
|
and from an |
There are no |
|
|
met; Article not peer- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galen College of Nursing - NUR 282 Course Syllabus - Version 3.3 19