Krista Hampton new rash Ihuman Case Study
Krista Hampton new rash Ihuman Case Study
Case Study: Krista Hampton V5.1 PC PL
Student Case Play Instructions
Please adhere to the assignment due dates in BlackBoard. The dates mentioned in the i-Human program are solely for administrative purposes. Late submissions will be considered if completed after the BlackBoard due date.
Grading Rubric Breakdown for Basic DDx Case:
a) HPI Statement (15%)
b) History (10%)
c) Physical Exam (10%)
d) Diagnostic Testing (10%)
c) Appropriate Selection and Ranking of Differential Diagnoses (20%)
d) Plan Covering All Critical Components of Patient’s Final Diagnosis (30%)
e) Clinical Exercises (5%)
Krista Hampton new rash Ihuman Case Study Instructions
Take the Patient’s History:
Limit of 100 history questions.
Assess HPI and related history comprehensively.
Determine if the case requires outpatient or inpatient treatment.
Document chief complaint and abnormal findings on the Key Finding list.
Use the Interview Progress Button wisely for feedback.
Perform a Physical Exam:
Assess vital signs based on the case type.
Document abnormal findings on the Key Finding list.
Write a concise HPI, including patient introduction and relevant medical details.
Complete Differential Diagnosis List:
Begin during history taking, finalize after the problem statement.
Aim for a comprehensive list (average: 5 diagnoses).
Points deducted for too few, not for having too many.
Order Tests:
Order tests for the top 2 diagnoses.
Link tests to a specific diagnosis.
Some tests “rule in,” others “rule out.”
Review Test Results:
Analyze results in the context of the differential diagnoses.
Select a Final Diagnosis:
Choose based on history, exam, and test findings.
Develop a Treatment Plan:
Follow course director guidelines.
Submission and Review:
Submit the case and review your score.
Avoid attempting to manipulate the system.
Completion time is recorded and correlates with performance.
Helpful Hints: Krista Hampton new rash Ihuman Case Study
Avatars and cases simulate real patients; confusing or incongruent information is intentional.
Phrasing of questions is crucial for clarity and accuracy.
Treat the case like a real clinical encounter.
Focus on mastering the diagnostic process for long-term clinical proficiency.
Allocate sufficient time for uninterrupted case completion.
Related Services
FAQ
What is the purpose of the Krista Hampton new rash iHuman Case Study?
The Krista Hampton new rash iHuman Case Study is designed to enhance your diagnostic reasoning skills in a clinical setting. It simulates a real patient encounter, allowing you to practice taking a patient’s history, conducting physical exams, ordering diagnostic tests, and formulating a comprehensive treatment plan. The case study aims to prepare you for real-world scenarios and improve your ability to navigate complex medical cases.
How many questions am I allowed to ask during the patient history-taking phase?
You are limited to a maximum of 100 history questions. It’s essential to use these questions wisely to assess all aspects of the patient’s History of Present Illness (HPI) and related history. The goal is to gather relevant information that will aid in developing a comprehensive differential diagnosis list and treatment plan.
What should be included in the concise HPI as part of the EMR?
The concise History of Present Illness (HPI) should start with a demographic introduction of the patient and their chief complaint. Include data on all aspects of the HPI, pertinent medical history, current medications, and other relevant history data supporting your diagnosis. This section is crucial for presenting a clear and organized overview of the patient’s condition.
How should I approach the differential diagnosis list?
You may start your differential diagnosis during the history-taking section. After completing the problem statement, reflect and finalize your list. The emphasis is on comprehensiveness; you won’t lose points for having too many diagnoses, but points may be deducted if the list is too short. On average, aim for around 5 diagnoses to demonstrate a thorough consideration of potential conditions.
What is the significance of ordering tests for the top 2 diagnoses?
When ordering tests, focus on the top 2 diagnoses and link each test to a specific diagnosis. Some tests may be ordered to “rule in” a diagnosis, while others aim to “rule out” a diagnosis. This strategic approach demonstrates your understanding of diagnostic reasoning and the selection of tests based on their relevance to the differential diagnoses.