Instructions
In the 21st century, more countries are researching and developing technologies for weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). There are terrorist groups and non-state actors, which is an individual or organization that has significant political influence but is not allied to any country or state, who are looking to further their agenda by obtaining and potentially using a WMD against their perceived enemy. This type of threat is not just a threat to one country but, rather, is a destabilizer to global security.
How and why do actors (state and non-state) philosophically justify (idealism, realism, pragmatism, or existentialism) the procession and possible use of a WMD device against a civilian population, especially in a post-9/11 era. Why do they not see themselves as possible reasons for destabilization of global security? Also include the threat of WMDs on global security.
Your essay must be at least two pages in length and include an introduction. You should use at least two outside sources (scholarly, peer-reviewed, or authoritative) in addition to your textbook as a reference.