Identify any legal, ethical and organisation factors that may be hindering effective supervision in relation to the case study. Explain what aspects w

Assessment 2: Written Report 30%
Due Date: Week 7
Word Count: 1500-1800 words
Your written report will include integration of class content, weekly readings and at least 8 scholarly articles other than text books.
You will consider the supervisor perspective in points 1 to 4 and the supervisee perspective in point 5 with the Kadushin model in the numbered points below.
The written report focusing on your specific case study, outline the following:

Identify any legal, ethical and organisation factors that may be hindering effective supervision in relation to the case study.Explain what aspects will be part of the contract and record keeping that will be used in assisting the supervisee in the case study.Describe what effective communication strategies, evaluation and feedback will be employed with regards to the case study.Discuss your control procedures and resources as relevant for this case study.Using the Kadushin model, plan a framework to explain how to address your education, support, administration and mediation needs if you were actually the supervisee in the case study in your next and future supervision meetings.

CriteriaArea to be coveredHDDCPFAcademic writing15%
(3)Statement of purpose of report is clear.
Report demonstrates a good understanding of subject with sufficient research conducted.
Effective use of outside sources
Intext citations and completed reference list is accurate following APA7 format.Identify ethical issues hindering effective supervision10%
(2)Understanding of target market.
Clear identification of barriers to effective supervision.
Any ethical considerations highlighted.Effective communication strategies20%
(5)Alternatives mentioned.
Recommendations seem well supported with research and analysis.
Demonstrated sound understandings of cultural communication strategies and conflict resolution.Plan a framework for supervision/ debriefing reports25%
(4)Clear statements of direction and well supported plan.
Control measures: training and evaluation procedures.
Key performance metrics.
Persuasive, logical, and compelling research and analysis.
Recommendations seem plausible and well supported by evidence.Discuss evaluation and control procedures for the scenario10% (2)Critical evaluation and control procedures for targeted client group.
Persuasive and sound.Resources for management10% (2)Outline recommended resources for management.
Demonstrated research and evaluation for available networks.Presentation10% (2)Overall structure: introduction, body, conclusion.
Persuasiveness.
Effective use of tables, illustrations and figures.Total100% (30)

Rubric

Assessment 2

CriterionHD
80-100%D
70-79%C
60-69%P
50-59%NN
0-50%Academic WritingDemonstrates very clear and strong understanding of the subject.
Effective use of external sources (10 or more).
Clear and concise intext citations and referencing using APA7 format.Demonstrated clear and good understanding of the subject.
Effective use of external sources (up to 10).
Clear and concise intext citations and referencing using APA7 format.Demonstrated a good understanding of the subject.
Good use of external sources (up to 8).
Clear and concise intext citations and referencing using APA7 format.Demonstrates adequate understanding of the subject.
Use of external sources (up to 6).
Intext citation and referencing which does not always follow APA7 format.Demonstrates a poor understanding of the subject.
Limited and ineffective use of external sources (less than 5).
Almost no intext citation and referencing does not follow APA7 format.Identify ethical issues that hinder effective supervisionDescribes and analyses very clearly and thoroughly.
Chooses objectives that are most relevant and clearly stated.Describes and analyses clearly and thoroughly.
Chooses objectives that are relevant and well stated.Describes and analyses well.
Objectives are well stated.Describes, analyses and states objectives in an adequate manner.Describes and analyses poorly or not at all.
States objectives poorly or not at all.Implement Effective communication strategies with staffDescribes implementation fully and clearly.
Includes comprehensive specifics of communication strategies.Describes implementation fully.
Includes specifics of communication strategies.Describes implementation well including most of communication strategies.Describes implementation with some omissions of specifics of communication strategies.Describes implementations poorly, omitting many specifics of communication strategies.Plan a framework for supervision/debriefing management and reportsFramework for management is complete and clearly stated and suitable for chosen style of supervision.Framework for management is complete and stated and is suitable for choses style of supervision.Framework for management is almost complete.
Generally suitable for chosen style of supervision.Framework for management is somewhat complete.
Generally adequately suitable for supervision.Describes implementation poorly, omitting many specifics of communication strategies.Draw evaluation and control procedures for the scenarioControl procedures are described in depth and include critical evaluation.Control procedures are described well and include critical evaluation.Describes well including critical evaluation and control procedures.Describes complete evaluation and control procedures in an adequate manner.Describes the control procedures inadequately or not at all.Resources for managementIn depth description of appropriate services suitable for supervision purposes.Identifies and clearly describes appropriate services suitable for supervision purposes.Identifies and describes well about appropriate services suitable for supervision purposes.Identifies and describes somewhat appropriate services suitable for supervision processes.Omits appropriate services suitable for supervision processes.PresentationPresentation is concise, correct and professional.
Presentation demonstrates a larger degree of clarity, is concise and correct.Presentation is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors.Presentation lacks some clarity or conciseness and contains some errors.Presentation is unfocused and contains unacceptable level of errors.