Paper will be submitted via Tumitin on Moodle 12 page minimum; no maximum
Essay Topics - Choose ONE
Compare and contrast the [economic, cultural] viability ot live bands to electronic based music starting in the 80's. Ex Analog vs. digital, computers vs. human reasoning, etc. (must still relate to central CBUM topic)*
Or
Compare and contrast musicality/production of the past w/ current trends in production (be specific regarding bands, band leaders/producers and song titles)
• Does predictability sale?
• Does sound quality sell?
• Do stereotypes sell?
Or
Should we realistically expect solutions to complex world problems from teens and twenty-something rappers and musician of today?
Or
As for the future of rap. are performers still able to authentically rap about the ■hood, when some of the conditions that created rap have changed?
(Ex. Ice Cube. Dr. Dre and others have become multimillionaires)
Or
1. Can hip-hop be viewed as a global-leaming-expenence?
• If so. how/why?
• If not. why not?
Essay Criteria:
Quality of Writing/Length
Topics need examples and/or thorough explanations; proofed and edited by YOU Clarity of Sub}ecMls It Understandable?)
Intent of Paper-
(Preparation: Integrity: Plagiarized or Not? Inspired thought or Uninspired?)
1. Writing must be focused on chosen topic and based on fads, not personal opinion.
2. The "cut and paste” effect will have a negative impact on the final score of the essay.
(Abstract your wiki” research into a unique statement: it's not that difficult to do; and it reinforces the material)
3. Spelling. Run- On sentences. Grammar. Proofing
(Strive for quality of thought and write in complete sentences: run spell check and grammar check, take pride in your wriling)
Chicago Style formatting Is suggested.
Name: Total /100
|
|
A |
B |
c |
I) |
F |
|
Content rio |
24-30Content is
extremely wcll- rcscarchcd, strong evidence is used to make a compelling
argument. |
21-23 Content is well-
re searched. evidence is used to make a persuasive argument. |
IK-20 Content is
researched, some evidence is used to support an argument. |
IS-IT Content shows
little research. Evidence is not well-integrated into argument or is
irrelevant to mam argument. |
0-14 Content lacks
research and supporting evidence. Argument is not clearly articulated or is
based on subjective opinion. |
|
Originality ’ |0 |
X-10 Overall argument
and use of sources show originality, creativity, and insight. |
7 Overall argument and use
of sources shows originality and creativity. |
6 Overall argument and
use of sources shows some originality and creativity- |
5 Overall argument and
use of sources shows little originality and creativity. |
0-4 Overall argument
lacks original thought and creativity. |
|
Writing /20 |
16-20 Writing is clear
and concise. Y'ocabulary is precise and used correctly. Uses correct grammar,
spelling, and punctuation. |
14-IS Writing is clear
and easy to understand. Vocabulary is less precise but used correctly.
Grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors arc rare and don't impede
understanding. |
12-13 Writing is un ders
tan da b Ic. Vocabulary is general and sometimes used correctly. Some
spelling, grammar and punctuation errors slow down the reader. |
10-1 1 Writing is unclear
and is difficult to understand. Use of vocabulary usunlLy incorrect Several
spelling, grammar or punctuation errors that impede understanding. |
<1-9 Writing cannot
be understood. |
|
Graphics (minimum of two) 10 |
X -10 Graphics arc well-
chosen and add clarity, substance, and nuance to the paper. Graphics are
contextualized within the argument and corroborate the research. They arc
cited in the correct format. |
7 Graphics arc wc 11-
choscn and add clarity and substance to the paper. Graphics corroborate the
research. They arc cited in the correct format. |
6 Graphics arc well-
chosen and usually add clarity to the paper. Graphics are related to the
research. Citations are present. |
5 Graphics arc present
but do not add clarity or substance to the paper. It is sometimes unclear how
they arc related to the research. Citations are present with several errors. |
0-4 Graphics arc missing
OR too many unrelated graphics that add neither substance nor clarity Co the
paper. No citations. |
|
Bibliography /10 |
X-10 Bibliography
entries and citations are present tor all researched material and show'
consistent formatting in a recognizable style. |
7 Bibliography entries
and citations arc present tor all researched material and arc in a
recognizable style with lew inconsistencies. |
6 Bibliography entries
and citations arc present for all researched material and arc in a
rccogruzablc format with some inconsistencies. |
5 Bibliography entries
and citations arc present for all researched material but formatting shows
several inconsistencies. |
0-4 Bibliography entries
and citations arc present only for some sources and formatting is not in any
recognizable sty le OR citations and bibliographv arc missing. |
|
Formatting ao |
16-20 Uses correct
formatting w ith no errors. |
14-15 Uses correct
formatting with few errors. |
12-13 Atterupts to
follow formatting guidelines with some errors. |
10-11 Attempts to follow
formatting guidelines with several errors. |
0-9 Formatting
guidelines were not followed. |
|
|
[*] Is the 'commercialization* of hip-hop a positive or negative phenomenon?
• Is hip-hop, as an art form, separate from the industry of hip hop?