Element

Not Met

Met

Exceeded

Points

0 – 15

16 – 19

20

Candidates participate
in and lead professional learning experiences to assist teachers in
selecting, administering, analyzing, interpreting assessments, and using
results for instructional dcision making in classrooms and schools (ILA
Standard

3.3)

The candidate did not effectively
address the rationale, the methods he/she was using, three ways in which to
assess subject matter in the classroom or addressed fewer than three ways of
assessment.

The candidate effectively addressed the
rationale, the methods he/she was using, and three ways in which to assess
subject matter in the classroom.

The candidate effectively addressed the
rationale, the methods he/she was using and offered more than three ways in
which to assess subject matter in the classroom

Points

0 – 7

8 – 9

10

Candidates, using both written and oral
communication, explain assessment results and advocate for appropriate
literacy and language practices to a variety of stakeholders, including
students, administrators, teachers, other educators, and parents/ guardians.
(ILA 3.4)

The candidate did not give or receive
adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and/or did not
write a logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators.

The candidate gave and received
adequate input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a
logical selfreflection., explaining its relevance for educators.

The candidate gave and received
comprehensive input from colleagues about the PDP presentations and wrote a
logical self-reflection., explaining its relevance for educators in detail.

Total
Possible Points

30